Men's Division II
Team	Record			Power Ratings			PR Rank
	2008	2009	Change	2008	2009	Change	2008	2009	Change
Wheeling Jesuit	4-7	6-4	0.236	77.73	83.26	8.46	22	11	11
Saint Leo	6-8	11-3	0.357	77.45	81.55	6.20	23	13	10
Seton Hill	6-6	7-5	0.083	78.35	81.93	5.41	21	12	9
Molloy	4-8	9-3	0.417	82.94	85.87	4.57	13	6	7
Queens U. of Charlotte	3-11	8-6	0.357	77.09	80.58	5.22	24	18	6
Mars Hill	9-6	11-4	0.133	79.30	81.42	3.15	20	14	6
Pfeiffer	3-9	6-5	0.295	74.14	77.91	5.55	28	23	5
Mercyhurst	9-4	11-3	0.093	85.27	88.47	5.08	9	4	5
Merrimack	12-4	14-3	0.074	84.39	86.38	3.14	10	5	5
Rollins	0-11	2-8	0.200	66.53	71.12	6.55	35	31	4
Belmont Abbey	9-4	6-6	-0.192	79.44	81.32	2.78	19	15	4
C. W. Post	11-3	15-1	0.152	87.70	91.90	6.75	4	1	3
Lees-McRae	2-9	2-10	-0.015	73.32	74.75	1.83	29	26	3
Bentley	7-7	9-4	0.192	83.19	84.38	1.84	11	9	2
Assumption	3-11	4-8	0.119	76.87	77.85	1.26	26	24	2
American International	1-10	0-12	-0.091	70.45	71.72	1.47	31	30	1
Grand Canyon	1-4	1-9	-0.100	69.49	70.37	0.82	32	32	0
Dominican U.	1-2	0-4	-0.333	67.80	63.48	-7.43	34	34	0
NYIT	12-1	9-2	-0.105	89.26	89.08	-0.09	2	3	-1
Dowling	12-3	7-6	-0.262	86.64	85.83	-1.18	6	7	-1
Wingate	11-3	8-8	-0.286	81.56	80.75	-1.38	16	17	-1
Limestone	12-2	10-4	-0.143	86.37	84.86	-2.29	7	8	-1
Le Moyne	15-2	16-1	0.059	91.90	90.23	-2.33	1	2	-1
St. Andrews	4-13	4-12	0.015	76.54	74.09	-4.15	27	28	-1
Saint Anselm	7-7	7-7	0.000	82.72	81.09	-2.62	14	16	-2
Franklin Pierce	2-12	1-11	-0.060	72.93	70.11	-4.87	30	33	-3
Pace	7-8	4-10	-0.181	80.60	79.26	-2.25	17	22	-5
Saint Michael's	8-7	7-7	-0.033	81.90	80.05	-3.00	15	20	-5
Adelphi	7-5	3-7	-0.283	87.34	83.89	-5.31	5	10	-5
Catawba	7-8	4-9	-0.159	80.18	75.74	-7.15	18	25	-7
S. New Hampshire	5-7	4-10	-0.131	83.07	79.67	-5.40	12	21	-9
Notre Dame de Namur	8-1	4-4	-0.389	86.28	80.16	-9.56	8	19	-11

Notes:

Only teams that played in both years are included.  However, power rating (PR) ranks were not altered to account for the deletions (which were few). Teams with the same PR on ratings pages may have different PR ranks here (e.g., if teams A and B both have a PR of 84.50 and ratings-page ranks of 27 and 28, respectively, their ranks may be reversed on this page, as ordering in the case of ties is arbitary). Teams are shown in descending order by change in PR rank and then by change in PR. Power rating change accounts for differences in the mean PR and the standard deviation between the two years and cannot be derived by subtraction. Greater change is naturally possible -- and in fact probable -- in the divisions having more teams. If they change, teams ranked near the extremes last year obviously have only one way to go; they can also change the most.

Copyright © 1997-2012 LaxPower