Men's Division II
Team	Record			Power Ratings			PR Rank
	2009	2010	Change	2009	2010	Change	2009	2010	Change
Florida Southern	2-5	4-9	0.022	73.09	83.57	11.19	29	19	10
Catawba	4-9	8-8	0.192	75.74	83.76	7.43	25	18	7
Dominican C.	1-12	6-9	0.323	74.30	82.29	6.54	27	21	6
Queens U. of Charlotte	8-6	9-4	0.121	80.58	85.98	4.57	18	12	6
Saint Michael's	7-7	6-6	0.000	80.05	85.59	4.57	20	14	6
Pace	4-10	7-7	0.214	79.26	84.03	2.46	22	16	6
Rollins	2-8	3-9	0.050	71.12	80.67	8.07	31	26	5
Dowling	7-6	12-2	0.319	85.83	90.66	6.35	7	2	5
Mars Hill	11-4	9-4	-0.041	81.42	87.28	6.04	14	9	5
Saint Leo	11-3	12-3	0.014	81.55	87.32	5.92	13	8	5
Limestone	10-4	12-2	0.143	84.86	89.86	6.16	8	5	3
Mercyhurst	11-3	13-1	0.143	88.47	91.90	4.85	4	1	3
Pfeiffer	6-5	8-9	-0.075	77.91	82.57	1.45	23	20	3
Franklin Pierce	1-11	3-8	0.189	70.11	79.42	6.98	33	31	2
Dominican U.	0-4	2-6	0.250	63.48	75.64	9.30	34	34	0
St. Andrews	4-12	3-10	-0.019	74.09	79.95	1.85	28	28	0
Belmont Abbey	6-6	7-6	0.038	81.32	85.13	1.58	15	15	0
Seton Hill	7-5	10-4	0.131	81.93	85.79	2.04	12	13	-1
Merrimack	14-3	13-3	-0.011	86.38	88.72	1.32	5	6	-1
Adelphi	3-7	10-5	0.367	83.89	86.65	0.79	10	11	-1
Bentley	9-4	9-5	-0.049	84.38	86.90	0.56	9	10	-1
Saint Anselm	7-7	6-8	-0.071	81.09	83.97	-0.55	16	17	-1
Assumption	4-8	3-10	-0.103	77.85	80.78	-2.29	24	25	-1
American International	0-12	2-13	0.133	71.72	79.12	3.80	30	32	-2
Le Moyne	16-1	15-2	-0.059	90.23	90.39	-1.16	2	4	-2
C.W. Post	15-1	16-1	0.004	91.90	90.53	-3.49	1	3	-2
S. New Hampshire	4-10	4-10	0.000	79.67	81.49	-3.64	21	24	-3
Notre Dame de Namur	4-4	6-5	0.045	80.16	81.53	-4.32	19	23	-4
NYIT	9-2	9-4	-0.126	89.08	87.94	-4.61	3	7	-4
Grand Canyon	1-9	1-8	0.011	70.37	74.27	-4.49	32	37	-5
Lees-McRae	2-10	2-8	0.033	74.75	78.27	-2.80	26	33	-7
Wingate	8-8	4-11	-0.233	80.75	79.70	-9.18	17	29	-12
Wheeling Jesuit	6-4	4-10	-0.314	83.26	80.24	-11.97	11	27	-16
Molloy	9-3	5-9	-0.393	85.87	81.98	-12.35	6	22	-16

Notes:

Only teams that played in both years are included.  However, power rating (PR) ranks were not altered to account for the deletions (which were few). Teams with the same PR on ratings pages may have different PR ranks here (e.g., if teams A and B both have a PR of 84.50 and ratings-page ranks of 27 and 28, respectively, their ranks may be reversed on this page, as ordering in the case of ties is arbitary). Teams are shown in descending order by change in PR rank and then by change in PR. Power rating change accounts for differences in the mean PR and the standard deviation between the two years and cannot be derived by subtraction. Greater change is naturally possible -- and in fact probable -- in the divisions having more teams. If they change, teams ranked near the extremes last year obviously have only one way to go; they can also change the most.

Copyright © 1997-2012 LaxPower