Men's Division II
TeamRecordPower RatingsPR Rank
20092010Change20092010Change20092010Change
Florida Southern2-54-90.022   73.0983.5711.19291910
Catawba4-98-80.192   75.7483.767.4325187
Dominican C.1-126-90.323   74.3082.296.5427216
Queens U. of Charlotte8-69-40.121   80.5885.984.5718126
Saint Michael's7-76-60.000   80.0585.594.5720146
Pace4-107-70.214   79.2684.032.4622166
Rollins2-83-90.050   71.1280.678.0731265
Dowling7-612-20.319   85.8390.666.35725
Mars Hill11-49-4-0.041   81.4287.286.041495
Saint Leo11-312-30.014   81.5587.325.921385
Limestone10-412-20.143   84.8689.866.16853
Mercyhurst11-313-10.143   88.4791.904.85413
Pfeiffer6-58-9-0.075   77.9182.571.4523203
Franklin Pierce1-113-80.189   70.1179.426.9833312
Dominican U.0-42-60.250   63.4875.649.3034340
St. Andrews4-123-10-0.019   74.0979.951.8528280
Belmont Abbey6-67-60.038   81.3285.131.5815150
Seton Hill7-510-40.131   81.9385.792.041213-1
Merrimack14-313-3-0.011   86.3888.721.3256-1
Adelphi3-710-50.367   83.8986.650.791011-1
Bentley9-49-5-0.049   84.3886.900.56910-1
Saint Anselm7-76-8-0.071   81.0983.97-0.551617-1
Assumption4-83-10-0.103   77.8580.78-2.292425-1
American International0-122-130.133   71.7279.123.803032-2
Le Moyne16-115-2-0.059   90.2390.39-1.1624-2
C.W. Post15-116-10.004   91.9090.53-3.4913-2
S. New Hampshire4-104-100.000   79.6781.49-3.642124-3
Notre Dame de Namur4-46-50.045   80.1681.53-4.321923-4
NYIT9-29-4-0.126   89.0887.94-4.6137-4
Grand Canyon1-91-80.011   70.3774.27-4.493237-5
Lees-McRae2-102-80.033   74.7578.27-2.802633-7
Wingate8-84-11-0.233   80.7579.70-9.181729-12
Wheeling Jesuit6-44-10-0.314   83.2680.24-11.971127-16
Molloy9-35-9-0.393   85.8781.98-12.35622-16


Notes:

  • Only teams that played in both years are included.  However, power rating (PR) ranks were not altered to account for the deletions (which were few).


  • Teams with the same PR on ratings pages may have different PR ranks here (e.g., if teams A and B both have a PR of 84.50 and ratings-page ranks of 27 and 28, respectively, their ranks may be reversed on this page, as ordering in the case of ties is arbitary).


  • Teams are shown in descending order by change in PR rank and then by change in PR.


  • Power rating change accounts for differences in the mean PR and the standard deviation between the two years and cannot be derived by subtraction.


  • Greater change is naturally possible -- and in fact probable -- in the divisions having more teams.


  • If they change, teams ranked near the extremes last year obviously have only one way to go; they can also change the most.
Create a free lacrosse website