Women's Division II
Team	Record			Power Ratings			PR Rank
	2011	2012	Change	2011	2012	Change	2011	2012	Change
Lenoir-Rhyne	5-10	12-4	0.417	61.58	73.25	5.20	44	26	18
Queens (NY)	9-8	10-7	0.059	64.04	74.29	3.97	35	23	12
Saint Anselm	4-10	8-8	0.214	64.18	75.08	4.88	29	19	10
Holy Family	7-10	14-4	0.366	63.11	72.10	2.02	41	33	8
New Haven	10-8	13-5	0.167	71.78	82.98	7.38	11	4	7
St. Thomas Aquinas	3-9	5-8	0.135	60.77	71.98	4.36	47	40	7
Seton Hill	7-10	11-6	0.235	64.26	74.55	4.08	27	20	7
Bloomsburg	10-7	12-7	0.043	69.34	77.95	3.23	18	13	5
Indiana (PA)	11-7	11-6	0.036	67.95	75.55	1.49	22	17	5
Bridgeport	0-11	2-9	0.182	49.02	67.16	10.42	62	58	4
Limestone	18-2	17-2	-0.005	73.26	82.69	5.41	9	5	4
Lake Erie	3-13	7-9	0.250	59.81	71.75	5.07	51	47	4
C.W. Post	13-4	17-3	0.085	75.54	83.95	4.67	6	2	4
Bentley	9-8	13-6	0.155	70.01	78.13	2.76	15	12	3
Mercy	9-6	7-8	-0.133	64.13	73.20	2.41	30	27	3
West Virginia Wesleyan	0-7	1-7	0.125	43.26	61.40	8.83	67	65	2
West Chester	16-5	16-4	0.038	73.51	82.64	5.07	8	6	2
Dominican	7-9	6-9	-0.037	60.60	71.83	4.34	48	46	2
Saint Michael's	2-13	4-11	0.133	62.14	71.98	2.90	43	41	2
Gannon	12-5	12-5	0.000	70.59	78.54	2.69	12	10	2
Indiana Tech	7-4	13-5	0.086	58.06	69.13	3.42	53	52	1
Shepherd	5-6	9-3	0.295	64.01	72.05	1.00	36	35	1
Rollins	13-4	15-2	0.118	73.85	81.75	3.52	7	7	0
Wilmington	4-12	9-8	0.279	59.91	70.56	3.37	50	50	0
Adelphi	20-0	16-3	-0.158	84.90	84.90	-4.04	1	1	0
Erskine	1-14	5-10	0.267	55.63	67.37	3.65	56	57	-1
Fort Lewis	5-6	5-5	0.045	62.51	71.95	2.46	42	43	-1
Converse	3-14	5-10	0.157	59.34	68.49	1.20	52	53	-1
Assumption	7-8	5-11	-0.154	64.08	72.22	1.15	31	32	-1
Mercyhurst	13-6	13-7	-0.034	70.56	76.52	0.01	13	14	-1
Le Moyne	17-3	16-3	-0.008	81.29	83.26	-2.39	2	3	-1
Reinhardt	2-5	6-7	0.176	46.48	61.24	5.19	64	66	-2
Southern Connecticut	0-14	1-15	0.063	53.17	66.06	4.52	58	60	-2
Slippery Rock	11-6	12-5	0.059	69.02	74.35	-1.26	20	22	-2
Adams State	0-9	0-9	0.000	46.45	59.85	3.35	65	68	-3
Edinboro	5-11	7-10	0.099	64.07	72.03	0.90	33	36	-3
Stonehill	15-4	14-5	-0.053	76.00	81.43	0.79	5	8	-3
Davenport	0-5	6-9	0.400	33.86	58.57	15.06	68	72	-4
Shorter	5-5	9-5	0.143	51.59	64.71	4.39	60	64	-4
Tennessee Wesleyan	7-2	9-4	-0.085	54.70	65.83	2.58	57	61	-4
Shippensburg	8-8	8-9	-0.029	65.69	72.59	-0.07	25	29	-4
S. New Hampshire	9-8	5-10	-0.196	68.86	74.05	-1.49	21	25	-4
Franklin Pierce	6-9	6-8	0.029	64.08	72.02	0.88	32	37	-5
Belmont Abbey	6-8	9-7	0.134	65.10	72.31	0.18	26	31	-5
Lock Haven	16-3	11-6	-0.195	76.97	79.82	-2.40	4	9	-5
Urbana	1-11	1-12	-0.006	47.52	59.79	2.13	63	69	-6
Kutztown	5-12	4-13	-0.059	63.98	71.93	0.87	38	44	-6
Millersville	4-10	6-11	0.067	64.22	72.09	0.82	28	34	-6
Savannah Art & Design	9-2	15-4	-0.029	61.34	69.32	0.18	45	51	-6
Queens	8-9	7-10	-0.059	67.51	72.38	-2.30	24	30	-6
Merrimack	12-7	7-9	-0.194	72.75	75.83	-3.25	10	16	-6
Chestnut Hill	7-10	3-13	-0.224	60.29	67.52	-1.12	49	56	-7
Molloy	11-5	9-8	-0.158	70.42	74.36	-2.74	14	21	-7
Notre Dame (OH)	7-4	6-8	-0.208	63.99	71.90	0.82	37	45	-8
Post	1-14	0-14	-0.067	51.79	61.05	-0.73	59	67	-8
Tiffin	5-7	2-14	-0.292	61.15	67.90	-1.52	46	54	-8
Pfeiffer	12-6	9-8	-0.137	69.88	74.20	-2.38	16	24	-8
Dowling	15-3	13-4	-0.069	77.01	78.38	-4.38	3	11	-8
American International	5-11	3-13	-0.125	63.73	71.53	0.60	40	49	-9
Regis (CO)	11-1	9-5	-0.274	69.34	72.63	-3.91	19	28	-9
Robert Morris (IL)	2-5	1-9	-0.186	43.61	54.51	-0.79	66	77	-11
Mo. Baptist	2-6	3-10	-0.019	50.77	57.49	-4.42	61	74	-13
Philadelphia	11-7	8-10	-0.167	64.04	71.55	0.29	34	48	-14
Georgian Court	15-4	12-7	-0.158	67.69	72.01	-2.98	23	39	-16
Lees-McRae	2-9	1-11	-0.098	56.50	58.44	-9.26	55	73	-18
East Stroudsburg	10-9	4-12	-0.276	69.53	72.01	-4.95	17	38	-21

Notes:

Only teams that played in both years are included.  However, power rating (PR) ranks were not altered to account for the deletions (which were few). Teams with the same PR on ratings pages may have different PR ranks here (e.g., if teams A and B both have a PR of 84.50 and ratings-page ranks of 27 and 28, respectively, their ranks may be reversed on this page, as ordering in the case of ties is arbitary). Teams are shown in descending order by change in PR rank and then by change in PR. Power rating change accounts for differences in the mean PR and the standard deviation between the two years and cannot be derived by subtraction. Greater change is naturally possible -- and in fact probable -- in the divisions having more teams. If they change, teams ranked near the extremes last year obviously have only one way to go; they can also change the most.

Copyright © 1997-2012 LaxPower