NCAA Tournament Selection Probabilities for Division I - 5/03

By Larry Feldman and Bill Allen

The NCAA Selection Committee now invites 26 teams to the Division I tournament. Thirteen berths are for automatic qualifiers (AQs), which are the champions of their conferences. The remaining 13 are at-large selections from teams not selected as AQs.

Below is a list of teams eligible for AQs followed by a list of teams we believe to have the highest probability of getting selected on an at-large basis.

Let's examine automatic qualifiers. Six are in already:

Atlantic 10: Massachusetts
Atlantic Coast: Maryland
Atlantic Sun: Jacksonville
Big South: High Point
Northeast: Monmouth
Patriot League: Navy

Seven AQs will be determined this weekend. Probabilities of winning a conference championship and hence an AQ are based on the match-ups and teams' power ratings.

American Lacrosse Conference
Favorite: Florida vs Northwestern
Other At-Large Possibilities: Florida, Northwestern, Penn State, Johns Hopkins

America East
Favorite: Stony Brook vs Albany
Albany may not make it if they lose

Big East
Favorite: Syracuse vs Georgetown
Other At-Large Possibilities: Syracuse, Georgetown, Connecticut, Loyola

Colonial
Favorite: Towson vs Hofstra
Other At-Large Possibilities: Towson, Hofstra, James Madison
Hofstra needs to win to go to the tournament

Ivy League
Favorite: Penn vs Dartmouth
Other At-Large Possibilities: Penn, Princeton, Cornell, Dartmouth

Metro Atlantic
Favorite: Canisius vs Marist
Loser goes home

MPSF
Favorite: Denver vs. Stanford
Loser goes on the bubble


Next, let's examine the remaining teams for at-large consideration. This may include teams that are still in contention for automatic qualification.

Probabilities of an at-large invitation are based on a team's RPI (ratings percentage index) and SOS (strength of schedule) ranking. Summing the two rankings yields a number that, over the past 10 years, predicts reasonably well whether a team will receive an invitation or be passed up.

Quality wins are not explicitly included in the primary or secondary selection criteria, but they still may play a role in the selection process, and that is why we consider them here. They basically answer the question, who did that team beat? The ranking is based on a scoring system such that if a team beats a top 5, top 10, top 20, or >top 20 team, it earns so many points. And if you lose to the same team, it loses points. The RPI ranking is used to determine whether a team is a top 5 etc., and the higher ranked the team, the greater the points earned (and vice versa for a loss).

Apparent Locks (9)

Florida
Wins-Losses            17-1
RPI Rank 5
SOS Rank 6
Quality Wins Rank 3
At-Large Probability 100.00

Northwestern
Wins-Losses            16-2
RPI Rank 2
SOS Rank 1
Quality Wins Rank 2
At-Large Probability 100.00

Syracuse
Wins-Losses            15-3
RPI Rank 4
SOS Rank 3
Quality Wins Rank 5
At-Large Probability 100.00

North Carolina
Wins-Losses            14-3
RPI Rank 3
SOS Rank 2
Quality Wins Rank 4
At-Large Probability 100.00

Georgetown
Wins-Losses            13-4
RPI Rank 6
SOS Rank 9
Quality Wins Rank 9
At-Large Probability 100.00

Virginia
Wins-Losses             9-9
RPI Rank 14
SOS Rank 4
Quality Wins Rank 20
At-Large Probability 100.00

Boston College
Wins-Losses            12-7
RPI Rank 11
SOS Rank 7
Quality Wins Rank 16
At-Large Probability 100.00

Penn State
Wins-Losses            12-6
RPI Rank 12
SOS Rank 10
Quality Wins Rank 15
At-Large Probability 99.87

Duke
Wins-Losses            11-5
RPI Rank 10
SOS Rank 16
Quality Wins Rank 12
At-Large Probability 86.99


Probable Selections (3)

Penn
Wins-Losses            10-5
RPI Rank 16
SOS Rank 12
Quality Wins Rank 18
At-Large Probability 68.94

Loyola
Wins-Losses            10-8
RPI Rank 18
SOS Rank 13
Quality Wins Rank 26
At-Large Probability 56.14

Notre Dame
Wins-Losses            12-4
RPI Rank 13
SOS Rank 19
Quality Wins Rank 13
At-Large Probability 52.70


On the Bubble (12 spots open)

Towson
Wins-Losses             9-8
RPI Rank 24
SOS Rank 15
Quality Wins Rank 30
At-Large Probability 24.33

Stanford
Wins-Losses            12-5
RPI Rank 22
SOS Rank 36
Quality Wins Rank 17
At-Large Probability 18.69

Dartmouth
Wins-Losses            10-6
RPI Rank 21
SOS Rank 23
Quality Wins Rank 22
At-Large Probability 11.61

Princeton
Wins-Losses            10-6
RPI Rank 19
SOS Rank 27
Quality Wins Rank 27
At-Large Probability 6.94

Cornell
Wins-Losses            10-6
RPI Rank 22
SOS Rank 25
Quality Wins Rank 23
At-Large Probability 6.71

Johns Hopkins
Wins-Losses            10-7
RPI Rank 28
SOS Rank 33
Quality Wins Rank 25
At-Large Probability 5.96

Denver
Wins-Losses            17-1
RPI Rank 9
SOS Rank 54
Quality Wins Rank 8
At-Large Probability 5.75

Louisville
Wins-Losses             9-6
RPI Rank 29
SOS Rank 20
Quality Wins Rank 24
At-Large Probability 5.56

Connecticut
Wins-Losses            13-4
RPI Rank 17
SOS Rank 32
Quality Wins Rank 11
At-Large Probability 5.56

James Madison
Wins-Losses            11-6
RPI Rank 20
SOS Rank 36
Quality Wins Rank 28
At-Large Probability 4.28

Stony Brook
Wins-Losses            15-2
RPI Rank 15
SOS Rank 38
Quality Wins Rank 7
At-Large Probability 4.20

Albany
Wins-Losses            12-4
RPI Rank 32
SOS Rank 41
Quality Wins Rank 17
At-Large Probability 1.73

2013-05-04



Create a free lacrosse website