EXPLANATION
There is no strict formula used by the NCAA Selection committee to determine
what teams are invited to the tournament. However, the committee does examine
certain criteria and probably priortizes them by some weight factors. The
Tournament Selection Index (TSI) attempts to guess at the factors that the committee
uses and weighs them uniformly. The TSI factors are: Computer Ranking, Polls, RPI
Ranking, Strength of Schedule Ranking, Quality Wins, Losses and performance in
the teams final five games. For a further explanation on the TSI, see detailed explanation
|
|
|
LaxPower congratulates the Onondaga Lazers -- 2007 NJCAA champions.
|
|
No Team
TSI Poll PR +
RPI +
SOS -
QWF +
LOSS +
TREND W- L- T
1
Onondaga -6.70 1 1 1 6 4.70 0.0 0 15- 0- 0
2
Nassau -4.70 2 2 2 1 3.30 0.6 2 12- 5- 0
3
Howard 4.60 3 3 4 7 3.80 0.4 2 14- 2- 0
4
Essex 5.20 4 5 5 2 2.60 0.8 2 9- 7- 0
5
Herkimer 7.90 6 4 3 4 1.30 1.2 2 11- 6- 0
6
Suffolk 16.50 7 7 7 3 0.50 1.0 3 4- 7- 0
7
Monroe 17.80 5 6 6 10 1.00 0.8 2 11- 4- 0
8
Anne Arundel 24.00 8 8 11 5 0.20 1.2 2 4-10- 0
9
Harford 33.20 9 9 12 9 0.00 1.2 4 5- 7- 0
10
Cayuga 37.90 13 8 14 0.10 1.0 2 8- 5- 0
11
Broome 40.80 10 11 9 20 0.00 0.8 1 11- 4- 0
12
Catonsville 41.10 12 14 11 0.30 1.4 3 6- 8- 0
13
Hudson Valley 41.30 10 10 18 0.10 1.4 2 9- 7- 0
14
Alfred State 42.40 16 13 8 0.00 1.4 4 3- 7- 0
15
Delhi 48.80 15 16 13 0.00 1.8 3 4- 9- 0
16
Mercyhurst North Ea 49.80 14 15 19 0.00 0.8 1 4- 4- 0
17
Finger Lakes 57.00 17 17 17 0.00 2.0 4 7-10- 0
18
Mohawk Valley 60.40 19 19 16 0.00 2.4 4 3-13- 0
19
Cobleskill 60.40 18 18 21 0.00 1.4 2 4- 7- 0
20
Dean 62.00 21 20 15 0.00 1.0 5 1- 8- 0
21
Montgomery 63.80 23 22 12 0.00 1.8 5 0-10- 0
22
Jefferson 68.80 20 21 23 0.00 1.8 3 3- 9- 0
23
Canton 73.40 22 23 22 0.00 1.4 5 0- 7- 0