EXPLANATION
There is no strict formula used by the NCAA Selection committee to determine
what teams are invited to the tournament. However, the committee does examine
certain criteria and probably priortizes them by some weight factors. The
Tournament Selection Index (TSI) attempts to guess at the factors that the committee
uses and weighs them uniformly. The TSI factors are: Computer Ranking, Polls, RPI
Ranking, Strength of Schedule Ranking, Quality Wins, Losses and performance in
the teams final five games. For a further explanation on the TSI, see detailed explanation
|
|
|
LaxPower congratulates the Nassau Lions
-- 2008 NJCAA champions.
|
|
No Team
TSI Poll PR +
RPI +
SOS -
QWF +
LOSS +
TREND W- L- T
1
Nassau -8.70 1 2 1 1 4.10 0.4 1 12- 3- 0
2
Onondaga 0.60 1 1 2 10 3.80 0.4 1 16- 2- 0
3
Essex 3.00 4 4 4 2 3.00 1.0 2 9- 8- 0
4
Herkimer 5.10 3 3 3 8 3.50 0.6 2 15- 3- 0
5
Howard 8.80 5 5 5 4 1.80 0.6 2 11- 3- 0
6
Monroe 20.00 8 6 6 9 0.20 1.2 1 10- 6- 0
7
Suffolk 21.60 7 7 9 7 0.20 0.8 2 9- 7- 0
8
Hudson Valley 28.50 6 9 8 14 0.30 0.8 2 14- 5- 0
9
Anne Arundel 28.70 9 8 15 5 0.70 1.4 2 4-10- 0
10
Catonsville 32.20 10 11 6 0.20 1.4 4 6- 8- 0
11
Broome 36.50 10 11 7 17 0.50 1.0 2 10- 5- 0
12
Finger Lakes 43.80 15 12 11 0.20 2.0 4 10-10- 0
13
Harford 45.80 17 20 3 0.00 1.8 4 1-12- 0
14
Delaware Tech. 46.00 13 16 12 0.00 1.0 4 5- 7- 0
15
Alfred State 46.10 14 10 18 0.10 1.2 3 8- 6- 0
16
Delhi 48.60 18 13 13 0.00 1.6 3 5- 8- 0
17
Jefferson 53.40 16 14 21 0.00 1.4 1 8- 7- 0
18
Cobleskill 55.40 12 17 23 0.00 1.4 2 7- 7- 0
19
Mercyhurst North Ea 57.40 19 18 15 0.20 1.6 4 5- 8- 0
20
Mohawk Valley 63.80 20 19 19 0.00 1.8 4 4- 9- 0
21
Montgomery 70.20 23 24 16 0.00 2.2 5 2-11- 0
22
Genesee 71.80 21 21 24 0.00 1.8 4 5- 9- 0
23
Cayuga 73.80 24 23 20 0.00 2.8 4 1-14- 0
24
Tompkins Cortland 74.80 22 22 25 0.00 1.8 4 3- 9- 0
25
Dean 78.60 25 25 22 0.00 1.6 5 0-10- 0