Women's Division II — Sun Aug 17 11:19:57 EDT 2008
-
EXPLANATION There is no strict formula used by the NCAA Selection committee to determine what teams are invited to the tournament. However, the committee does examine certain criteria and probably priortizes them by some weight factors. The Tournament Selection Index (TSI) attempts to guess at the factors that the committee uses and weighs them uniformly. The TSI factors are: Computer Ranking, Polls, RPI Ranking, Strength of Schedule Ranking, Quality Wins, Losses and performance in the teams final five games. For a further explanation on the TSI, see detailed explanation
No Team TSI Poll PR + RPI + SOS - QWF + LOSS + TREND W- L- T 1 C.W. Post -3.50 2 2 1 2 1.90 0.4 2 17- 2- 0 2 Adelphi 0.20 3 3 3 3 2.00 0.2 1 16- 1- 0 3 West Chester 0.60 1 1 2 11 3.60 0.2 0 20- 1- 0 4 Limestone 3.00 3 4 4 4 2.20 0.2 1 17- 2- 0 5 Gannon 17.20 7 7 7 6 0.40 0.6 1 11- 4- 0 6 Lock Haven 17.40 6 6 5 10 0.40 0.8 1 15- 4- 0 7 Stonehill 32.60 5 5 6 26 0.00 0.6 1 14- 3- 0 8 Belmont Abbey 34.40 10 12 13 8 0.00 1.4 1 12- 7- 0 9 S. New Hampshire 39.00 10 9 18 0.00 1.0 1 12- 6- 0 10 New Haven 43.00 9 9 8 27 0.60 0.6 1 14- 3- 0 11 Dowling 44.00 11 11 20 0.00 1.0 1 10- 5- 0 12 Molloy 45.40 16 10 15 0.00 1.4 3 10- 7- 0 13 Pfeiffer 46.50 13 22 7 0.10 1.6 3 8- 9- 0 14 Mercyhurst 48.50 8 8 12 30 0.10 0.6 1 12- 3- 0 15 Bloomsburg 49.80 17 15 12 0.00 1.8 4 9- 9- 0 16 Bryant 61.40 19 17 21 0.00 1.4 3 10- 8- 0 17 Bentley 65.00 21 20 19 0.00 2.0 3 7-10- 0 18 Philadelphia 66.80 14 14 36 0.20 1.0 2 12- 5- 0 19 Queens 67.40 20 21 23 0.00 1.4 2 11- 7- 0 20 Regis (CO) 69.60 29 34 1 0.00 1.6 4 1-11- 0 21 East Stroudsburg 70.40 23 16 28 0.00 1.4 2 11- 7- 0 22 Shippensburg 74.60 25 29 14 0.00 2.6 4 4-13- 0 23 Merrimack 75.20 22 19 29 0.00 1.2 4 8- 6- 0 24 St. Andrews 75.40 27 26 17 0.00 2.4 3 7-12- 0 25 Millersville 76.40 15 24 33 0.00 1.4 3 8- 7- 0 26 Rollins 77.80 30 25 16 0.00 1.8 5 3- 9- 0 27 Saint Michael's 78.40 24 18 32 0.00 1.4 3 9- 7- 0 28 Indiana (PA) 80.80 33 32 9 0.00 2.8 4 3-14- 0 29 Lees-McRae 83.00 35 36 5 0.00 3.0 4 1-15- 0 30 Georgian Court 86.00 18 23 42 0.00 1.0 2 11- 5- 0 31 St. Thomas Aquinas 89.20 31 28 24 0.00 2.2 4 5-11- 0 32 Saint Anselm 92.00 28 27 31 0.00 2.0 4 5-10- 0 33 Notre Dame (OH) 94.60 26 30 37 0.00 0.6 1 11- 4- 0 34 Southern Connecticu 95.40 34 33 22 0.00 2.4 4 3-13- 0 35 Assumption 103.40 37 35 25 0.00 2.4 4 2-14- 0 36 Slippery Rock 104.40 42 41 13 0.00 3.4 5 0-17- 0 37 Wilmington 110.20 32 31 43 0.00 1.2 3 9- 6- 0 38 Franklin Pierce 116.20 39 37 34 0.00 2.2 4 3-12- 0 39 Chestnut Hill 118.20 36 38 40 0.00 1.2 3 4-11- 0 40 Seton Hill 121.20 38 39 38 0.00 2.2 4 4-13- 0 41 Kutztown 124.40 40 40 39 0.00 1.4 4 2- 8- 0 42 American Internatio 125.80 41 42 35 0.00 2.8 5 0-16- 0 43 Dominican 133.00 43 43 41 0.00 2.0 4 2-12- 0To compare power ratings over the past nine years, click here. You need Java to see this feature. Get a free download at Java..Sponsored Links