Utah — Tue Jun 22 19:27:15 EDT 2010

See Strength of Schedule for an explanation. There are three sos calculations: the 1st averages the opponents computer rating based on computer margin of victory "Reg In" and "ROM", the 2nd is similar to the first but instead of a simple average, it weighs games against stronger teams more heavily, and the 3rd is based on the RPI SOS formula used by the NCAA. This factor is not used in the power rating calculation.
Use the Report Scores link for both scores and missing games.
Rank Team Total SOS Ave SOS Wt Ave SOS RPI W L T Games Rnk Value Rnk Value Rnk Value 1 Orem 12 1 73.38 1 46.73 19 0.49 1 11 0 2 Waterford, UT 12 2 72.87 2 46.04 17 0.49 2 10 0 3 Juan Diego CS 12 3 72.55 3 45.58 18 0.49 5 7 0 4 Jordan, UT 13 4 72.33 4 45.19 7 0.51 5 8 0 5 Riverton 15 5 72.24 5 45.19 1 0.53 12 3 0 6 Bingham 13 6 72.06 6 44.79 11 0.51 7 6 0 7 Logan 11 7 71.70 7 43.74 4 0.51 0 11 0 8 American Fork 12 8 71.37 8 43.25 24 0.49 1 11 0 9 Lehi 12 9 71.24 9 43.07 22 0.49 1 11 0 10 West Jordan 12 10 71.02 10 42.78 23 0.49 4 8 0 11 Pleasant Grove 13 11 70.74 11 42.39 9 0.51 7 6 0 12 Copper Hills 15 12 70.73 12 42.35 6 0.51 12 3 0 13 Timpview 13 13 70.53 13 42.06 10 0.51 7 6 0 14 Alta 15 14 70.09 16 41.30 2 0.53 15 0 0 15 Lone Peak 15 15 70.07 14 41.31 3 0.52 14 1 0 16 East, UT 11 16 70.02 15 41.30 20 0.49 3 8 0 17 West, UT 11 17 69.91 17 41.15 15 0.49 2 9 0 18 Sky View 12 18 69.51 18 40.71 25 0.49 5 7 0 19 Skyline 14 19 69.29 19 40.57 12 0.50 6 8 0 20 Cache Valley 15 20 69.19 21 40.16 5 0.51 13 2 0 21 Weber 12 21 69.18 20 40.22 21 0.49 7 5 0 22 Bountiful 14 22 69.01 22 39.92 14 0.49 12 2 0 23 Park City 14 23 68.59 23 39.46 8 0.51 10 4 0 24 Woods Cross 12 24 68.22 24 38.49 26 0.48 0 12 0 25 Murray 13 25 67.95 25 38.26 13 0.50 6 7 0 26 Olympus 14 26 67.52 26 37.62 16 0.49 12 2 0 27 Judge Memorial CS 12 27 67.45 27 37.50 27 0.48 5 7 0 28 Brighton, UT 12 28 67.44 28 37.49 28 0.48 5 7 0
Create a free lacrosse website