Nevada — Sun Aug 21 10:27:13 EDT 2011

See Strength of Schedule for an explanation. There are three sos calculations: the 1st averages the opponents computer rating based on computer margin of victory "Reg In" and "ROM", the 2nd is similar to the first but instead of a simple average, it weighs games against stronger teams more heavily, and the 3rd is based on the RPI SOS formula used by the NCAA. This factor is not used in the power rating calculation.
Congratulations to Palo Verde - 2011 SNLL Division 1 Champions, Spring Valley - 2011 SNLL Division 2 Champions and Spanish Springs 2011 TTLL Champions
Rank Team Total SOS Ave SOS Wt Ave SOS RPI W L T Games Rnk Value Rnk Value Rnk Value 1 Bishop Gorman 14 1 88.02 1 73.37 8 0.51 1 13 0 2 Legacy 13 2 88.00 3 73.27 10 0.50 1 12 0 3 Henderson 24 3 87.95 2 73.32 7 0.51 20 4 0 4 Palo Verde 20 4 87.04 4 71.53 5 0.52 14 6 0 5 Centennial 21 5 86.80 5 70.98 14 0.49 17 4 0 6 Faith Lutheran 13 6 86.51 6 70.55 13 0.49 5 8 0 7 Green Valley 13 7 86.13 7 69.75 15 0.49 6 7 0 8 Bishop Manogue 15 8 70.59 8 42.45 2 0.55 7 8 0 9 Cimarron 13 9 70.05 9 41.71 19 0.48 0 13 0 10 Galena 14 10 69.93 11 41.37 18 0.48 4 10 0 11 Wooster 11 11 69.84 12 41.28 21 0.46 1 10 0 12 Faith Lutheran II 12 12 69.68 10 41.39 12 0.50 2 10 0 13 High Sierra-Reno 13 13 69.57 15 40.90 4 0.54 9 4 0 14 Henderson II 15 14 69.44 13 40.96 1 0.55 11 4 0 15 Arbor View 13 15 69.32 14 40.95 9 0.50 5 8 0 16 Palo Verde II 12 16 68.84 16 40.28 16 0.49 4 8 0 17 Red Rock 14 17 68.52 18 39.64 6 0.52 11 3 0 18 Spanish Springs 12 18 68.49 19 39.10 3 0.55 12 0 0 19 Centennial II 14 19 68.40 17 39.65 17 0.48 7 7 0 20 Truckee-Tahoe 9 20 68.26 20 39.07 20 0.46 5 4 0 21 Spring Valley 15 21 67.09 21 37.65 11 0.50 14 1 0 22 McQueen 2 22 65.66 22 35.28 22 0.31 0 2 0
Create a free lacrosse website