Utah — Mon Jun 18 18:46:43 EDT 2012

See Strength of Schedule for an explanation. There are three sos calculations: the 1st averages the opponents computer rating based on computer margin of victory "Reg In" and "ROM", the 2nd is similar to the first but instead of a simple average, it weighs games against stronger teams more heavily, and the 3rd is based on the RPI SOS formula used by the NCAA. This factor is not used in the power rating calculation.
Use the Report Scores link for both scores and missing games.
Rank Team Total SOS Ave SOS Wt Ave SOS RPI W L T Games Rnk Value Rnk Value Rnk Value 1 Alta 17 1 62.06 1 32.48 1 0.61 10 7 0 2 Riverton 15 2 61.06 2 31.26 4 0.56 6 9 0 3 Park City 15 3 58.93 3 28.45 2 0.58 11 4 0 4 Juan Diego CS 12 4 58.68 5 27.77 5 0.56 5 7 0 5 Skyline, UT 13 5 58.57 4 27.98 6 0.56 6 7 0 6 Brighton, UT 13 6 58.55 6 27.64 7 0.55 8 5 0 7 Bingham 19 7 58.29 7 27.36 3 0.58 19 0 0 8 Judge Memorial CS 11 8 56.71 8 26.14 14 0.51 2 9 0 9 Jordan, UT 14 9 56.29 10 25.51 8 0.53 12 2 0 10 Lone Peak 11 10 55.87 9 25.51 10 0.52 4 7 0 11 Olympus 13 11 55.26 11 24.43 13 0.52 8 5 0 12 Murray 12 12 55.15 12 24.11 11 0.52 3 9 0 13 Copper Hills 12 13 54.40 13 23.86 9 0.53 4 8 0 14 Cache Valley 11 14 51.77 14 20.45 15 0.51 3 8 0 15 Herriman 14 15 47.42 15 17.64 17 0.50 5 9 0 16 Woods Cross 13 16 46.84 18 16.27 12 0.52 5 8 0 17 Sky View 10 17 46.69 16 16.90 16 0.50 2 8 0 18 Waterford, UT 11 18 46.29 17 16.29 20 0.47 1 10 0 19 West Jordan 13 19 46.12 19 15.46 18 0.50 4 9 0 20 Viewmont 15 20 43.81 21 13.27 19 0.49 13 2 0 21 American Fork 13 21 43.35 20 13.43 21 0.44 7 6 0 22 West, UT 12 22 42.95 22 12.86 25 0.43 3 9 0 23 Davis, UT 12 23 42.43 23 12.54 24 0.43 6 6 0 24 Lehi 13 24 41.72 24 12.35 23 0.44 7 6 0 25 Weber 13 25 41.62 25 11.89 26 0.41 9 4 0 26 Pleasant Grove, UT 12 26 41.53 26 11.84 27 0.39 2 10 0 27 Timpanogos 15 27 40.19 27 10.75 22 0.44 15 0 0 28 Timpview 11 28 39.86 28 10.68 28 0.38 2 9 0
Create a free lacrosse website