See Strength of Schedule for an explanation. There are three sos calculations:
the 1st averages the opponents computer rating based on
computer margin of victory "Reg In" and "ROM", the 2nd
is similar to the first but instead of a simple average, it
weighs games against stronger teams more heavily, and
the 3rd is based on the RPI SOS formula used by the NCAA. This factor is not used in the power rating calculation
and uses only the top ten (rpi based) teams.
|
|
|
Send schedules to george@laxpower.com
| |
Rank Team Total
SOS Ave SOS Wt Ave SOS RPI W L T
Games Rnk Value Rnk Value Rnk Value
1
Milford 15 1 87.55 1 72.15 2 0.73 7 7 0
2
Delaware Hayes 17 2 87.25 2 71.60 1 0.84 14 3 0
3
Lebanon 15 3 84.66 3 66.66 3 0.67 10 5 0
4
Big Walnut 16 4 82.56 4 63.19 6 0.57 7 8 0
5
Ottawa Hills 13 5 82.14 5 61.76 4 0.67 5 8 0
6
Springboro 16 6 81.77 6 60.97 5 0.61 10 6 0
7
Fairfield 12 7 79.65 8 56.88 11 0.52 7 5 0
8
St Thomas Aquinas 13 8 79.43 7 56.93 8 0.54 12 1 0
9
Avon Lake 15 9 79.39 9 56.79 7 0.56 10 5 0
10
Marysville 16 10 79.19 10 56.66 9 0.52 8 7 0
11
Eastlake LC 15 11 78.16 12 54.64 10 0.52 4 10 0
12
Anderson 16 12 78.05 11 54.67 17 0.45 9 6 0
13
Dayton LC 11 13 78.02 14 54.13 16 0.45 1 9 0
14
Uniontown-Lake 10 14 77.77 13 54.23 19 0.41 3 7 0
15
Grand River Academy 9 15 76.14 15 51.80 24 0.29 1 8 0
16
Bellbrook 14 16 76.13 17 50.94 14 0.48 12 2 0
17
Buckeye Valley 11 17 76.12 16 51.39 18 0.42 3 7 0
18
Eagle LC 16 18 75.94 18 50.65 23 0.33 6 9 0
19
Alder 11 19 75.86 19 50.60 12 0.49 0 10 0
20
Licking Valley LC 8 20 73.78 20 47.50 15 0.45 4 3 0
21
CCS Lacrosse 14 21 73.62 22 46.99 20 0.41 3 10 0
22
Little Miami 16 22 73.54 21 47.03 22 0.35 12 3 0
23
Clinton County 10 23 72.43 23 44.97 13 0.48 2 7 0
24
Canfield 13 24 69.98 24 42.56 21 0.36 7 5 0
25
Olmsted Falls 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0
