See Strength of Schedule for an explanation. There are three sos calculations:
the 1st averages the opponents computer rating based on
computer margin of victory "Reg In" and "ROM", the 2nd
is similar to the first but instead of a simple average, it
weighs games against stronger teams more heavily, and
the 3rd is based on the RPI SOS formula used by the NCAA. This factor is not used in the power rating calculation
and uses only the top ten (rpi based) teams.
|
|
|
Congratulations to Grassfield LC - 2013 HRLL Champions
| |
Rank Team Total
SOS Ave SOS Wt Ave SOS RPI W L T
Games Rnk Value Rnk Value Rnk Value
1
Williamsburg LC 13 1 87.20 1 71.53 1 0.80 9 4 0
2
Richmond LC 15 2 83.11 2 64.32 2 0.64 8 7 0
3
Grafton LC 15 3 82.58 3 62.97 4 0.55 9 6 0
4
Jefferson Forest LC 12 4 82.49 4 62.44 14 0.49 6 5 0
5
East Rockingham 6 5 82.47 10 61.77 21 0.43 0 4 0
6
Great Bridge LC 11 6 82.40 5 62.43 11 0.51 2 9 0
7
York LC 11 7 82.40 6 62.43 12 0.50 1 10 0
8
First Colonial LC 12 8 82.20 8 61.94 19 0.48 0 12 0
9
Kellam LC 13 9 82.13 7 62.17 10 0.51 5 8 0
10
Cave Spring 12 10 82.10 11 61.60 5 0.54 10 2 0
11
F.W.Cox LC 13 11 81.96 9 61.86 13 0.50 6 7 0
12
Rustburg LC 12 12 81.76 12 61.31 6 0.52 1 7 0
13
Princess Anne LC 12 13 81.58 13 61.00 18 0.48 3 9 0
14
Tabb LC 16 14 81.51 14 60.71 8 0.52 14 2 0
15
Grassfield LC 20 15 81.46 16 60.53 7 0.52 18 2 0
16
Poquoson LC 16 16 81.31 15 60.60 9 0.52 8 8 0
17
New River Valley 14 17 81.25 17 60.52 20 0.45 6 7 0
18
Maury LC 12 18 81.20 18 60.35 17 0.48 5 7 0
19
Menchville LC 13 19 81.17 19 60.22 15 0.49 8 5 0
20
Hickory LC 13 20 80.72 20 59.36 16 0.48 10 3 0
21
William Byrd 15 21 79.45 21 57.07 3 0.56 7 7 0
22
West End LC 6 22 78.55 22 54.88 22 0.22 0 6 0
