Utah — Sat Oct 19 10:18:51 EDT 2013

See Strength of Schedule for an explanation. There are three sos calculations: the 1st averages the opponents computer rating based on computer margin of victory "Reg In" and "ROM", the 2nd is similar to the first but instead of a simple average, it weighs games against stronger teams more heavily, and the 3rd is based on the RPI SOS formula used by the NCAA. This factor is not used in the power rating calculation and uses only the top ten (rpi based) teams.
Use the Report Scores link for both scores and missing games.
Rank Team Total SOS Ave SOS Wt Ave SOS RPI W L T Games Rnk Value Rnk Value Rnk Value 1 Alta 13 1 63.06 1 32.98 2 0.61 8 5 0 2 Park City 15 2 62.94 4 32.14 1 0.63 13 2 0 3 Jordan, UT 12 3 62.69 2 32.38 4 0.58 5 7 0 4 Brighton, UT 13 4 62.66 5 31.88 6 0.57 4 9 0 5 Bingham 16 5 62.16 3 32.27 8 0.56 11 5 0 6 Olympus 13 6 61.44 6 30.41 3 0.60 8 5 0 7 Riverton 14 7 60.91 7 30.36 7 0.57 8 6 0 8 Juan Diego CS 12 8 60.55 8 29.81 10 0.55 5 7 0 9 Copper Hills 11 9 59.68 10 28.37 9 0.56 1 10 0 10 Skyline, UT 15 10 59.27 9 28.57 5 0.57 14 1 0 11 Judge Memorial CS 11 11 57.57 11 26.66 11 0.54 4 7 0 12 Lone Peak 12 12 56.24 12 25.38 13 0.49 5 7 0 13 Cache Valley 11 13 53.46 13 23.05 14 0.48 5 6 0 14 Waterford, UT 14 14 49.94 17 17.99 12 0.51 7 7 0 15 Weber 13 15 49.84 14 18.81 19 0.45 3 10 0 16 Viewmont 11 16 49.43 15 18.74 15 0.48 8 3 0 17 Timpanogos 11 17 49.42 18 17.95 18 0.45 4 7 0 18 Timpview 11 18 49.37 16 18.38 21 0.44 2 9 0 19 Herriman 14 19 48.75 19 17.35 16 0.47 10 4 0 20 Lehi 13 20 48.06 21 16.75 17 0.47 8 4 1 21 Davis, UT 10 21 47.88 20 16.83 22 0.43 4 6 0 22 Sky View 13 22 47.88 22 16.67 20 0.45 7 5 1 23 Roy 12 23 47.32 23 16.07 25 0.42 1 11 0 24 West, UT 11 24 47.32 24 16.02 26 0.42 0 11 0 25 American Fork 13 25 47.01 25 16.01 23 0.43 10 3 0 26 West Jordan 12 26 46.98 26 15.81 24 0.43 4 8 0 27 Woods Cross 11 27 45.65 27 14.75 27 0.41 8 3 0 28 Pleasant Grove, UT 11 28 45.45 28 14.62 28 0.40 5 6 0
Create a free lacrosse website