National Junior College Athl. Assn. — Thu Apr 17 21:15:21 EDT 2014

See Quality Win Factor for an explanation. There are three quality win calculations: the 1st rewards points for defeating teams based on local computer margin of victory calculation, the 2nd is based on a local poll ranking, if one exists, and the 3rd is based on local RPI rankings. Only games within a league are counted and games out of region are ignored. This factor is not used in the power rating calculation.
Teams are now in the heart of conference action to set up seedings for end-of-season tournaments.
Rank Team QWF PR QWF Poll QWF RPI W L T Rnk Value Rnk Value Rnk Value 1 Onondaga 1 7.57 1 3.40 1 8.07 12 0 0 2 Nassau 2 7.07 2 2.88 2 6.50 11 1 0 3 Essex 3 6.23 3 2.00 3 5.60 10 2 0 4 Anne Arundel 4 5.53 4 1.03 4 5.33 11 4 0 5 Delhi 6 3.57 5 0.75 5 3.90 10 2 0 6 Hudson Valley 21 0.87 6 0.53 24 0.47 1 7 0 7 Mohawk Valley 18 1.23 7 0.53 19 1.00 4 6 0 8 Monroe 8 2.80 8 0.53 8 2.50 9 2 0 9 Niagara County 22 0.87 9 0.53 25 0.47 1 9 0 10 Genesee 15 1.70 10 0.23 13 1.63 4 8 0 11 Harford 5 3.83 11 0.23 6 3.77 7 5 0 12 Union County 11 1.93 12 0.10 14 1.53 6 7 0 13 ASA College 17 1.30 13 0.00 20 0.97 4 4 0 14 Brookdale 23 0.73 14 0.00 22 0.67 2 9 0 15 Broome 27 0.40 15 0.00 23 0.63 3 8 0 16 Catonsville 9 2.67 16 0.00 9 2.30 7 7 0 17 Cayuga 28 0.07 17 0.00 28 0.10 1 10 0 18 Cecil College 29 0.00 18 0.00 29 0.00 0 4 0 19 Dean College 12 1.80 19 0.00 10 2.30 7 4 0 20 Delaware Tech 16 1.60 20 0.00 16 1.37 5 9 0 21 Finger Lakes 13 1.70 21 0.00 12 1.83 8 7 0 22 Herkimer 24 0.70 22 0.00 21 0.93 5 5 0 23 Howard 7 3.00 23 0.00 7 2.73 6 5 0 24 Jefferson 20 1.00 24 0.00 18 1.07 4 4 0 25 Morris 19 1.13 25 0.00 17 1.10 4 7 0 26 Northampton 30 0.00 26 0.00 30 0.00 0 6 0 27 Northern Virginia 10 2.30 27 0.00 11 2.30 7 4 0 28 Southern Maryland 26 0.50 28 0.00 27 0.33 2 7 0 29 Suffolk 14 1.70 29 0.00 15 1.43 4 7 0 30 Tompkins Cortland 25 0.53 30 0.00 26 0.43 4 8 0
Create a free lacrosse website